|
مقاله
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
IOL calculation in phacomorphic glaucoma; a challenge
|
|
Author(s):
|
Mohammad Soleimani, Hossein Fonoudi,Seyed Ali Tabatabaei, Reza Mirshahi, Bahman Inanlo, Mohammad Reza Mansouri
|
|
Presentation Type:
|
Poster
|
|
Subject:
|
Cornea and Anterior Segment
|
|
Others:
|
|
|
Presenting Author:
|
|
|
Name:
|
Mohammad Soleimani
|
|
Affiliation :(optional)
|
Farabi Eye Hospital
|
|
E mail:
|
soleimani_md@yahoo.com
|
|
Phone:
|
88647168
|
|
Mobile:
|
09121096496
|
|
|
|
|
Purpose:
|
To compare between different intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas in patients with phacomorphic glaucoma.
|
|
Methods:
|
In a prospective case series study, twenty patients with phacomorphic glaucoma were included in the study. All patients underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification and IOL (SA60 manufactured by Alcon) implantation by the same surgeon. Predicted IOL power (PI) was documented by targeting the actual refraction after IOL implantation, then IOL prediction error (PE) was calculated using subtracting PI from implanted IOL power. Mean and variance of both PE and refractive PE were calculated.
|
|
Results:
|
PI and refractive PI were highest in Haigis and Holladay II (with no significant difference between these two formulas) than SRKT, Hoffer Q formulas. Actually, these formulas tend to make these patients myopic after IOL implantation.
|
|
Conclusion:
|
IOL calculation in phacomorphic glaucoma (with shallow anterior chamber depth and intumescent crystalline lens) may result in incorrect calculations. Hoffer Q and SRKT formulas could prepare the best results in this setting, respectively. Accuracy of IOL calculation formulas in patients with phacomorphic glaucoma
|
|
Attachment:
|
203IOL.pptx
|
|
|