image 2 image 4
Skip Navigation Links
 Home 
 Congress Structure 
 Important Dates 
 Venue 
 Registration 
 Pre Registered 
 Abstracts 
 Scientific Program 
 Exhibition 
 Contact Us 
 Personal page 
 Photo and Film Festival 
       XXVII Annual Congress of the Iranian Society of Ophthalmology        بـیــست و هفتمین کنــگــره سـالیـانه انـجـمـن چـشـم پـزشـکی ایـــران
مقاله Abstract


Title: Optic nerve head and macular OCT Measurements in Papilledema Compared to Pseudopapilledema
Author(s): Masoud Aghsaei Fard
Presentation Type: Oral
Subject: Strabismus & Neuro-ophthalmology
Others:
Presenting Author:
Name: Masood Aghsaie fard, Sara Okhravi
Affiliation :(optional) Farabi Eye Hospital
E mail: masood219@gmail.com
Phone: 4794177
Mobile: 09127934689
Purpose:

To compare macular and optic nerve head optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements in mild to moderate papilledema and pseudopapilledema.

Methods:

: Macular scans with macular ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) and macular RNFL (retinal nerve fiber layer) segmentation were performed, divided into 2 regions (inner and outer, with a diameter of 3 and 6 mm, respectively) and 8 sectors (4 each sectors in the inner and outer regions) in addition to Bruch’s membrane opening (BMO) area and peripapillary RNFL thickness in three groups of subjects.

Results:

119 eyes of 61 subjects with mild to moderate papilledema, 88 eyes of 48 subjects with pseudopapilledema, and 60 eyes of 60 healthy normal subjects were enrolled in this cross section study. BMO area was similar in papilledema (1.83±0.34 mm²), pseudopapilledema (1.85±0.37 mm²), and controls (1.85±0.32 mm²). Average inner region macular GCIPL thickness in the papilledema, pseudopapilledema, and control groups was 87.2±14.4 µm, 90.8±6.1 µm and 91.2±9.8 µm, respectively (P>0.05). Outer temporal region macular GCIPL was significantly thinner in the papilledema group compared to control group (P=0.01). In contrast, outer inferior and outer nasal macular RNFL sectors were significantly thicker in the papilledema group compared to control groups (P= 0.01 and P<00.1, respectively). Those measures were not different between pseuodopapilledema and control eyes.

Conclusion:

In papilledema eyes, outer temporal region macular GCIPL thickness decreased and outer inferior and outer nasal macular RNFL sectors thickness increased compared to the control group. These changes were not observed in pseudopapilledema group.

Attachment:





Skip Navigation Links
        صفحه اصلی
        ساختار کنگره
        تاریخ های مهم
        مکان برگزاری
        ثبت نام
        ثبت نام شدگان
        اطلاعات هتل - رزرو
        مقالات
        برنامه کنگره
        جشنواره فیلم و عکس
        نمایشگاه
        تماس با ما
        صفحه شخصی
        جستجوی سخنران
        آرشیو کنگره سالهای گذشته
        شب کنگره چشم پزشکی
 
ورود شرکت کنندگان
نام کاربری :
کلمه عبور :
  کلمه عبور خود را فراموش کرده ام.
Total Visits
Find us on Social Media
Congress Count Down
Today Label
Last Month Label
Total Visitors Label