image 2 image 4
Skip Navigation Links
 Home 
 Congress Structure 
 Important Dates 
 Venue 
 Registration 
 Pre Registered 
 Abstracts 
 Scientific Program 
 Exhibition 
 Contact Us 
 Personal page 
 Photo and Film Festival 
       XXVII Annual Congress of the Iranian Society of Ophthalmology        بـیــست و هفتمین کنــگــره سـالیـانه انـجـمـن چـشـم پـزشـکی ایـــران
مقاله Abstract


Title: Comparison of Visual Outcomes and Complications of Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lens With and Without a Central Hole Implantation for Correction of High Myopic Astigmatism
Author(s): Seyed Javad Hashemian, Mohammad Ebrahim Jafari
Presentation Type: Oral
Subject: Cornea and Anterior Segment
Others:
Presenting Author:
Name: Seyed javad Hashemian
Affiliation :(optional) Eye Research Center, Rassoul Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Iran
E mail: sj_hashemian@yahoo.com
Phone: 22583455
Mobile: 09121142168
Purpose:

To evaluate the visual outcomes and complications after Visian Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) implantation V4c (with centraflow technology) and V4 for correction of high myopia and myopic astigmatism.

Methods:

A retrospective, comparative interventional case series of V4c and V4 ICL implantation done for correction of high myopia and astigmatism. The outcome measures that were evaluated included preoperative and postoperative uncorrected and corrected distant visual acuity (UDVA), (CDVA), endothelial cell count (ECC), presence of lens opacification, intraocular pressure (IOP) and lens rotation. A follow-up of upto 1 year was done.

Results:

46 eyes underwent V4c ICL with centraflow implantation and 40 eyes had implantation of V4 ICL with intraoperative peripheral iridectomy (PI). The mean preoperative manifest spherical equivalent (MSE) was -8.65±2.8 D and -8.51±3.6 D in the V4c and V4 groups respectively which reduced to postoperative values of -0.16± .34 D and -0.33±.41 D respectively. The mean preoperative astigmatism was -1.38±1.3 D and -1.65±1.14 D that respectively reduced to -0.51±0.48 D and -0.46±0.37 D. At the end of 1 year follow up, mean ECC loss was 2.41% and 3.17%, respectively in the V4c and V4 groups. No anterior subcapsular opacities were seen in both groups. One eye of V4c (2.2%) and three eyes of V4 (7.5%) groups required re-rotation surgery. The safety indices were 1.21 and 1.32 and efficacy indices were 1.15 and 1.21 in the V4c and V4 groups respectively at the end of 1 year.

Conclusion:

Both V4c and V4 Visian ICL implantations are comparable in terms of visual outcome and safety profile for correction of high myopia and astigmatism. However, V4c ICL offers these advantages without the requirement of an additional PI.

Attachment:





Skip Navigation Links
        صفحه اصلی
        ساختار کنگره
        تاریخ های مهم
        مکان برگزاری
        ثبت نام
        ثبت نام شدگان
        اطلاعات هتل - رزرو
        مقالات
        برنامه کنگره
        جشنواره فیلم و عکس
        نمایشگاه
        تماس با ما
        صفحه شخصی
        جستجوی سخنران
        آرشیو کنگره سالهای گذشته
        شب کنگره چشم پزشکی
 
ورود شرکت کنندگان
نام کاربری :
کلمه عبور :
  کلمه عبور خود را فراموش کرده ام.
Total Visits
Find us on Social Media
Congress Count Down
Today Label
Last Month Label
Total Visitors Label